tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25071644456445219082024-03-13T07:51:14.843-07:00Galileo routJohn DShttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08013701887336857035noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2507164445644521908.post-75860681365181868362014-02-24T13:54:00.000-08:002014-02-24T14:05:36.777-08:00How Galileo has been routed and will always be<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 130%;">"The
Earth orbits The Sun and rotates daily around itself", Nicolaus
Copernicus, Galileo Galilei, Johannes Kepler, Isaac Newton, Albert
Einstein and others have claimed.<br /><br />It is very important to know that </span><span style="font-size: 130%;"><i>alleged</i> rotation of The Earth around itself</span><span style="font-size: 130%;"> and its <i>alleged</i> orbit around The Sun </span><span style="font-size: 130%;"><b>isn't a self-evident truth but</b></span><span style="font-size: 130%;"> is </span><span style="font-size: 130%;"><b>a conclusion</b></span><span style="font-size: 130%;">. And </span><span style="font-size: 130%;"><b>all human conclusions <i>can</i> fail</b></span><span style="font-size: 130%;">.<br /><br />Hence,
unlike with the self-evident truths, it isn't unreasonable to question
whether the claim and the conclusion of Galileo, Copernicus, Newton,
Einstein and others is true or not</span>.<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 130%;">Let's
examine <b>two</b> very rarely known and acted upon <b>facts</b> about the theory
supported and popularized by the life and work of Galileo Galilei and
how each of them causes the rout of Galileo Galilei and of all
like-minded men (let's call them 'Galileos' and individually 'a
Galileo') aka 'Galileo rout':<b> </b></span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 130%;"><b>1. fact:</b></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 130%;"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_revolution#New_ideas">Wikipedia admits</a>: "<span style="font-weight: bold;">The geocentric model was nearly universally accepted until 1543</span> when Nicolaus Copernicus published his book entitled De revolutionibus orbium coelestium <span style="font-weight: bold;">and was widely accepted into the next century.</span>".</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 130%;">Astronomy is a science <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_astronomy">older than 3 000 years</a>. The theory about the moving Earth <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heliocentrism#Greek_and_Hellenistic_world">was well known in ancient Greece </a>(3rd-4th century BC).</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 130%;">So,
according to the testimony of the Wikipedia's sources, scientists of
mutually hostile backgrounds (Chaldeans, Greeks, Christians, Muslims,
Chinese) were practically unanimous in rejection of the moving Earth
theory and in acceptance of Geocentrism for about 2 000 years and possibly even longer.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 130%;">If there were no certain scientific proof against the moving Earth and for Geocentrism how could so different people have been <i>unanimous for about 2 000 years or longer on that</i>?</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 130%;">Claim
that so different people could be unanimous on one opinion against the
other opinion for so long a period (about 2000 years or longer!) is
nothing else but a plain lie. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 130%;">So there <i>must have been</i> one or more <i>scientific</i> <i>proofs</i> for Geocentrism and against the moving Earth theory.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 130%;">This fact of unanimous acceptance of Geocentrism <b>and of rejection</b>, </span><span style="font-size: 130%;"><i><b>by</b> <b>scientists</b></i>, </span><span style="font-size: 130%;"><b>for 2 000 years or longer</b>, <b>of the moving Earth theory</b> <i><b>is sufficient proof for Geocentrism and against </b></i>Heliocentric theory and against Center of mass theory etc., that is, <i><b>all the moving Earth theories</b></i>.</span><br />
<br />
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 130%;">And <b>this fact causes </b></span><span style="font-size: 130%;"><b>Galileo Galilei rout</b> (and rout of other <i>Galileos</i>: <i>Nicolaus Copernicus, Johannes Kepler, Isaac Newton, Albert Einstein</i>, etc.).</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<span style="font-size: 130%;">It
also causes the death of Heliocentric theory (aka Heliocentrism, Heliocentric
model, Copernican theory, Copernican model, Copernicanism), the death
of the theory about Center of mass (Sun-Earth barycenter) etc. and the death of trust
in modern "science" because they are all based on the<b> <i>scientifically</i> long rejected</b> and <b>thus certainly false</b> moving Earth theory.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: 130%;"><br /></span>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 130%;"><b>2. fact:</b> </span><br />
<span style="font-size: 130%;"><br /></span>
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 130%;">The theory of Galileos claims that surface of The Earth allegedly rotates with velocity of 463 m/s (1 667 km/h) at The Earth's equator and with velocity of 355 m/s (1 277 km/h) at geographical latitude of 40 degrees north and south of the equator.</span><br />
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 130%;">Note that both velocities are above the velocity of sound in the air at 68 </span><span style="font-size: 130%;">
<style type="text/css">P { margin-bottom: 0.08in; }</style></span><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "Helvetica Neue",Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><span style="background: none repeat scroll 0% 0% transparent;">°</span><style type="text/css"></style>F</span></span><span style="font-size: 130%;"> (20 </span><span style="font-size: 130%;">
<style type="text/css">P { margin-bottom: 0.08in; }</style></span><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "Helvetica Neue",Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><span style="background: none repeat scroll 0% 0% transparent;">°</span><style type="text/css"></style></span></span><span style="font-size: 130%;">C)!</span><br />
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 130%;">They also claim that the air travels with the same velocities at the same geographical latitudes and carries everything with it so that the things in the air wouldn't be <i>always</i> left behind which doesn't happen in reality.</span><br />
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 130%;">Now, think about these alleged velocities of The Earth's surface.</span><br />
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 130%;">Why not make an experiment with a conveyor belt moving at 463 m/s (1 667 km/h) </span><span style="font-size: 130%;">and then at 355 m/s (1 277 km/h), </span><span style="font-size: 130%;"><span style="font-size: 130%;"></span><span style="font-size: 130%;"></span><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "Helvetica Neue",Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><span style="background: none repeat scroll 0% 0% transparent;"></span></span></span>at the above temperature, with the wind blowing </span><span style="font-size: 130%;">above the same belt and at the velocity of the belt, and let a human volunteer try to step on, walk, sit, lie, work and live on the belt in such conditions so that we see how according to Galileos we live on the allegedly rotating Earth. Before attempting to do this the volunteer should make sure he has made his last will.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 130%;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: 130%;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 130%;">The scientists of old didn't have technology we possess but had the reason to compare the highest velocities on The Earth they had seen and measured to those alleged velocities of The Earth's surface mentioned above and to conclude that life on The Earth is impossible with such parameters.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 130%;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: 130%;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 130%;">It is then no wonder that <b>the ancient theory of Galileos</b> about the alleged daily rotation of The Earth around its axis <b>has always been rejected by all true scientists</b> from ancient times till today.</span><br />
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 130%;">It's more than shocking what an absurdity, impossibility and lie majority of men has advocated as allegedly 'scientific' 'truth'. They aren't scientists but charlatans.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 130%;"> </span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
<span style="font-size: 130%;"><b><i>Necessary conclusions from 2. fact</i></b>: </span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 130%;">The Earth is stationary;</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 130%;">the sky rotates around The Earth and isn't stationary as Galileos have falsely claimed;</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 130%;">The Sun daily orbits The Earth and The Sun isn't stationary in or around the center as Galileos have falsely claimed;</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 130%;">The Earth is in the center of the heavenly sphere - the sky; </span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 130%;">the theory of <i>Galileos</i> whose fundamental tenets are the moving Earth and the not-in-the-center-of-the-sky</span><span style="font-size: 130%;"><span style="font-size: 130%;"> </span>Earth is false; </span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 130%;"><i><b>2. fact</b></i> proves Geocentrism as true and causes <b><i>Galileo rout</i></b> of all <i>Galileos</i>. </span><br />
<span style="font-size: 130%;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: 130%;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: 130%;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 130%;"><i><b>One Objection and Reply to Objection</b></i>:</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 130%;"><i><b>Objection</b></i>: "There are experimental proofs for the rotation of The Earth.", some have claimed.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 130%;"><i><b>Reply to Objection</b></i>: </span><span style="font-size: 130%;">Nothing evidently absurd, impossible and false can be proven. In general, there are fakes instead of proofs as e.g. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piltdown_Man">"Piltdown man"</a> is, or way more often, as it seems, misinterpretations of experiments, in ignorance or intentionally.</span></div>
John DShttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08013701887336857035noreply@blogger.com0